I suppose we should all be grateful that yesterday's matchup with the Hilltoppers of Western Kentucky was not televised. You had to pay $5.95 on ACC Select, a premium service which allows you to watch conference matchups streaming on the internet. The 27-13 final may elicit some strong reactions from those of you who JUST saw the score and not the action.
"Wait, really? We only won by 2 touchdowns?"
"Did they really score 13 points on us?"
"Isn't this the same team that lost by more then 40 points a piece to Kentucky and Alabama?"
Yes. Yes. And yes.
Virginia Tech has clinging to a 10-3 lead late in the first half, when the offense started to spark a bit and we converted a 4th and goal into 6 points. Then, Macho had a 50 yard interception return which was almost a touchdown, but he was pushed out of bounds at the 5. We settled for a field goal since there were only 3 seconds left.
Adantage Hokies 20-3.
We got the ball to start the half and drove down the field for a touchdown. 27-3 Hokies. Now THAT is more like it, right. That is more like the score you would expect in this game. Put in your reserves. Get some valuable playing time. Walk out with a victory on Homecoming.
Someone forgot to tell Western Kentucky.
I should tell you that WKU opted to put in a wide receiver turned running back turned quarterback turned whatever into the game to take the direct snap and run the read option. For some reason, Bud's boys had some trouble defending it and they marched down the field for a field goal.
Then, down 27-6, they converted an onside kick. (Oh, I should mention this is after they had converted a fake punt in the first half. Special teams - advantage WKU).
WKU managed to score one more time, and then we took Tyrod out in favor of Sean Glennon, I guess to make sure he didn't get hurt.
So, a team that had not given up a sack all day gave up 5. FIVE sacks. I guess when Sean is in there, you know you can bring the heat because he sure isn't going to beat you with his legs. (Decision to burn Tyrod's redshirt - advantage BEAMER).
There are some positives to take out of this game.
Darren Evans continues to impress. He added two more touchdowns to his already impressive resume.
Macho Harris continues to return kicks well, read defenses well, and catch the ball for the defense well.
We are 5-1. Hard to argue with that record limping into the bye week
I guess that is really the issue. This was a game that came at a perfect time. It should have allowed us to work on the passing game, ironed out some of the wrinkles on offense, gotten the defense some more reps to work on pass coverage (their biggest weakness) and helped us to work on kickoffs and punt coverage.
The passing game wasn't terrible, but nothing to rave at against this defense.
Western Kentucky rarely threw the ball; instead, they gashed us on the ground play after play.
How we don't have someone who can kick the ball into the endzone is beyond me. Beamer instead has decided to kick it high and short giving the coverage team a chance to get downfield to make a play. Hmmm.
Lots of questions going into the bye week, but it does come at a great time. The team is 5-1 overall and 2-0 in conference. No one, including myself, would have predicted that after the loss to ECU and the lackluster performance against Furman.
The fact is teams have letdowns. After three close, gritty wins against good competition, it was expected.
And need I remind you VT football historians of a little game in 1998 against Temple.
It was at home.
It was a 5-0 squad against an 0-5 squad.
Oh yeah, and it was homecoming.
Thank goodness for bye weeks.